Roller-Coaster: Europe, 1950-2017

Roller-Coaster: Europe, 1950-2017

After the overwhelming horrors of the first half of the 20th century, described by Ian Kershaw in his previous book as being 'to Hell and back', the years from 1950 to 2017 brought peace and relative prosperity to most of Europe. Enormous economic improvements transformed the continent. The catastrophic era of the world wars receded into an ever more distant past, though i After the overwhelming horrors of the first half of the 20th century, described by Ian Kershaw in his previous book as be...

DownloadRead Online
Title:Roller-Coaster: Europe, 1950-2017
Author:Ian Kershaw
Rating:
Genres:History
ISBN:Roller-Coaster: Europe, 1950-2017
ISBN
Edition Language:English
Format Type:Hardcover
Number of Pages:656 pages pages

Roller-Coaster: Europe, 1950-2017 Reviews

  • Liviu
    May 09, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Andrew
    Apr 14, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Dinesh Krithivasan
    May 20, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Margarida
    Nov 20, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Kalinhristov
    Oct 20, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Andrew S.
    Dec 10, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Riet
    Nov 23, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

  • Titus Hjelm
    Dec 04, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

  • Steve
    May 24, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • John
    May 30, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Alex
    May 25, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Patrick Desmet
    Sep 01, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Petar
    Dec 03, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Márcio Barros
    Mar 01, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • TT
    May 16, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Ernesthc
    Sep 09, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Dan
    Nov 07, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

  • Arska
    Jul 31, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Andy
    Apr 13, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Katarina
    May 09, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Diogo Moreira
    May 07, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Ghislaine Cow
    Nov 28, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Betsy
    Sep 28, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Leonardo
    Apr 11, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Ed Greening
    Sep 29, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • haroon Saad
    Dec 10, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Jelle
    Sep 21, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Justin Wong
    Sep 05, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Tom
    May 20, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Þráinn Guðbrandsson
    Apr 03, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Thomas
    Mar 14, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Geert Claassens
    Aug 27, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Miguel Guerreiro
    Apr 27, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Lakigigar
    May 29, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Dominic Sero-Asturi
    Apr 16, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Baswiegerinck
    Mar 18, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Moschowski
    Oct 18, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

  • Muller Chan
    May 27, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Aditya Pareek
    May 12, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Ziggfred
    Mar 29, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Tom Quinn
    Nov 02, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • A.Serrano.Gudingmail.Com
    May 23, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Seth Lewis
    May 22, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Konstantin Bätz
    Apr 08, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Niels Wang-Holm
    May 17, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Shaie B
    May 24, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Jeff Tyner
    May 22, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Thomas Huttinga
    Oct 11, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

  • T.
    Apr 13, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Matthew Foldi
    Mar 12, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Miroslav Gospodinov
    Aug 31, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Hiddedor
    Nov 06, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Bart
    Mar 19, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Vytautas
    May 04, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...

    Solid, but somewhat uninspired history in the liberal tradition. Nothing controversial--although on austerity Kershaw is unclear: cuts are bad, but keynesianism doesn't seem to work either--but nothing exciting either. 'Islamic terrorism' gets disproportionate attention considering the...

    Dit boek verdient alleen al 5 sterren voor de ongelofelijke hoeveelheid werk, die de schrijver er voor heeft verzet. Heel interessant. voor mij vooral de eerste 30 jaar na 1950. Daarna ligt alles nog redelijk in het geheugen. Kershaw geeft nog eens gedetaileerd weer hoe de Europese Uni...

    A general history needs some way to put its own spin on familiar facts. Kershaw doesn't manage that. Everything feels like it could have come straight from the newspaper headlines, with occasional (and un-insightful) interjections from the op-ed pages. ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

    ...

  • Daniel1974nlgmail.com
    Nov 16, 2018

    Perhaps better than Joudt's Post War. According to Kershaw himself, the most beautifull book he ever wrote but arguably also the best book he ever wrote. It should be mandatory reading for every European politician or individual that thinks Europe should be dismantled. Though quite...